{"id":830,"date":"2021-04-22T09:30:28","date_gmt":"2021-04-22T09:30:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hello.inherentknowledge.org\/2024\/2021\/04\/22\/ibms-project-debater-showcases-next-gen-ai-driven-productivity-2\/"},"modified":"2021-04-22T09:30:28","modified_gmt":"2021-04-22T09:30:28","slug":"ibms-project-debater-showcases-next-gen-ai-driven-productivity-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hello.inherentknowledge.org\/2024\/2021\/04\/22\/ibms-project-debater-showcases-next-gen-ai-driven-productivity-2\/","title":{"rendered":"IBM\u2019s Project Debater showcases next-gen AI-driven productivity"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>Disclosure: IBM is a client of the author.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>I\u2019ve been following IBM\u2019s Watson effort since the beginning \u2014 and its initial focus on winning the game <em>Jeopardy<\/em>. This early effort was just a taste of what this platform could do.<\/p>\n<p>Years later, I attended the introduction of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.research.ibm.com\/artificial-intelligence\/project-debater\/\">Project Debater<\/a>, which took the platform to a debate competition against a top human debater. Like the initial computer chess match, the computer lost. But, unlike chess, the loss was subjective. If I had been a judge, I would have been more likely to award Watson the win, given the computer responses was more entertaining, more accurate, and arguably more interesting than the positions put forth by the human.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"jumpTag\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.computerworld.com\/article\/3612349\/ibm-s-project-debater-showcases-next-gen-ai-driven-productivity.html#jump\">To read this article in full, please click here<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Disclosure: IBM is a client of the author. I\u2019ve been following IBM\u2019s Watson effort since the beginning \u2014 and its initial focus on winning the game Jeopardy. This early effort was just a taste of what this platform could do. Years later, I attended the introduction of Project Debater, which took the platform to a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-830","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hello.inherentknowledge.org\/2024\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/830","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hello.inherentknowledge.org\/2024\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hello.inherentknowledge.org\/2024\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hello.inherentknowledge.org\/2024\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=830"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hello.inherentknowledge.org\/2024\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/830\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hello.inherentknowledge.org\/2024\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=830"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hello.inherentknowledge.org\/2024\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=830"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hello.inherentknowledge.org\/2024\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=830"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}